Thomas Bartkus wrote: > If you are writing strictly for the MS Windows platform > And > If the database is running single user with a "locally stored database" on a > Windows workstation. > Then > The MS Access file based (.mdb) system is hard to argue with.
I disagree. What does .mdb/jet without Access offer you that you don't get from e.g. SQLite except vendor lock-in and horrible deviations from the SQL standard? Ok, it does give you somewhat stronger typing, which you might possibly want, but if that's an issue, I'd suggest embedded firebird (if we want serverless). I'm not entirely sure something SQLish is the way to go though. Also, the best ODBC adaper for Python, mxODBC, isn't free. Last time I used adodbapi, it was a bit buggy, and pure ADO or DAO solutions don't follow the Python standard DB-API 2. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list