On 7 March 2013 09:28, Rui Maciel <rui.mac...@gmail.com> wrote: > rusi wrote: > > > Anyone who's used emacs will know this as the bane of FLOSS software > > -- 100 ways of doing something and none perfect -- IOW too much > > spurious choice. > > > This is a fallacy. Just because someone claims that "there are 100 ways of > doing something and none perfect", it doesn't mean that restricting choice > leads to perfection. It doesn't. It only leads to getting stuck with a > poor solution with no possibility of improving your life by switching to a > better alternative. >
This thread reminds me of an article I read recently: http://rubiken.com/blog/2013/02/11/web-dev-a-crazy-world.html It's mostly a matter of having enough time to evaluate what's best for you. In the case of RoR vs Django, you will (assuming zero knowledge) need to learn a language, then a framework. That's quite a time consuming task. Personally I've opted for Django because I've used Python for years. I've written some Ruby in the past, but I not enough to make me choose RoR over Django to get stuff done. -- ./Sven
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list