On 1 avr, 21:28, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:15 AM, jmfauth <wxjmfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Py32 > >>>> import timeit > >>>> timeit.repeat("'a' * 1000 + 'ẞ'") > > [0.7005365263669056, 0.6810694766790423, 0.6811978680727229] > >>>> timeit.repeat("'a' * 1000 + 'z'") > > [0.7105829560031083, 0.6904999426964764, 0.6938637184431968] > > > Py33 > > import timeit > > timeit.repeat("'a' * 1000 + 'ẞ'") > > [1.1484035160337613, 1.1233738895227505, 1.1215708962703874] > > timeit.repeat("'a' * 1000 + 'z'") > > [0.6640958193635527, 0.6469043692851528, 0.6458961423900007] > > This is what's called a microbenchmark. Can you show me any instance > in production code where an operation like this is done repeatedly, in > a time-critical place? It's a contrived example, and it's usually > possible to find regressions in any system if you fiddle enough with > the example. Do you have, for instance, a web server that can handle > 1000 tps on 3.2 and only 600 tps on 3.3, all other things being equal? > > ChrisA
----- Of course this is an example, as many I gave. Examples you may find in apps. Can you point and give at least a bunch of examples, showing there is no regression, at least to contradict me. The only one I succeed to see (in month), is the one given by Steven, a status quo. I will happily accept them. The only think I read is "this is faster", "it has been tested", ... jmf -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list