On 02/04/2013 10:24, jmfauth wrote:
On 2 avr, 10:35, Steven D'Aprano <steve
+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:03:17 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
So what? Who cares if it takes 0.00002 second to insert a character
instead of 0.00001 second? That's still a hundred times faster than you
can type.
---------
This not the problem. The interesting point is that they
are good and "less good" Unicode implementations.
jmf
The interesting point is that the Python 3.3 unicode implementation is
correct, that of most other languages is buggy. Or have I fallen victim
to the vicious propaganda of the various Pythonistas who frequent this list?
--
If you're using GoogleCrap™ please read this
http://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython.
Mark Lawrence
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
