Vito De Tullio writes: > rusi wrote: > > > [Not everything said there is correct; eg python supports currying > > better [than haskell which is surprising considering that > > Haskell's surname is [Curry!] > > AFAIK python does not support currying at all (if not via some > decorators or something like that).
I suppose rusi means functools.partial: >>> from functools import partial >>> trip = lambda x,y,z: (x,y,z) >>> partial(trip,'a','b')('c') ('a', 'b', 'c') It also supports keyword arguments. > Instead every function in haskell implicitly support currying... > so... how does "no support" is better than "full support"? Yes. I'm satisfied that Python does, but what can be seen as a shortcoming in Haskell? Just curious. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list