On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Peter Cacioppi <peter.cacio...@gmail.com> wrote: > So Python was designed reasonably well, with a minimum of hacky-screw-ups. > This happened because Python's growth was effectively managed by an > individual who was well suited to the task. In other words, "Guido was here". > > Good thread, I learned a lot from it, thanks.
Pretty much, yeah. We're saying the same thing, only I'm focusing on the importance of design rather than deifying the person who designed it. But yes, that comes to much the same result. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
