On 15/10/2013 21:11, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le lundi 14 octobre 2013 21:18:59 UTC+2, John Nagle a écrit :
----
[...]
No, Python went through the usual design screwups. Look at how
painful the slow transition to Unicode was, from just "str" to
Unicode strings, ASCII strings, byte strings, byte arrays,
16 and 31 bit character builds, and finally automatic switching
between rune widths. [...]
Yes, a real disaster.
This "poor" Python is spending its time in reencoding
when necessary, without counting the fact it's necessary to
check if reencoding is needed.
Where is Unicode? Away.
jmf
I very much look forward to seeing your correct Python unicode
implementation on the bug tracker.
--
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Most poems rhyme,
But this one doesn't.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
