Den onsdagen den 30:e oktober 2013 kl. 08:07:31 UTC+1 skrev Tim Roberts: > jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > >Why did Python not implement end... The end is really not necessary for > > >the programming language it can be excluded, but it is a courtesy to > > >the programmer and could easily be transformed to indents automaticly, > > >that is removed before the compiliation/interpretation of code. > > > > You only say that because your brain has been poisoned by languages that > > require some kind of "end". It's not necessary, and it's extra typing. 99% > > of programmers do the indentation anyway, to make the program easy to read, > > so why not just make it part of the syntax? That way, you don't > > accidentally have the indentation not match the syntax. > > -- > > Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com > > Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
Well Tim ***one could argue*** why not do a (i think it is called parser) that react to "loop", "end" and "function". And lazy like me do not have to think about "what is not part of program". I certainly do not like the old bracket style it was a catastrophe, but in honesty the gui editor of python should have what i propose, a parser that indent automaticly at loops, functions and end. I promise you it will save millions of hours of bug searching all over world in a month. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
