In article <mailman.6472.1391742656.18130.python-l...@python.org>, Tim Chase <python.l...@tim.thechases.com> wrote:
> On 2014-02-06 22:00, Roy Smith wrote: > > > list does not promise better than O(1) behavior > > > > I'm not aware of any list implementations, in any language, that > > promises better than O(1) behavior for any operations. Perhaps > > there is O(j), where you just imagine the operation was performed? > > Pish...there's always O(0) which is achieved by *not* performing some > unneeded operation ;-) O(-1). In Soviet Russia, operation performs you! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
