On 2014-02-06 22:00, Roy Smith wrote: > > list does not promise better than O(1) behavior > > I'm not aware of any list implementations, in any language, that > promises better than O(1) behavior for any operations. Perhaps > there is O(j), where you just imagine the operation was performed?
Pish...there's always O(0) which is achieved by *not* performing some unneeded operation ;-) -tkc -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
