Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> writes: > So can you simply: > > $ python -m foo.fooprog > > ? (or 'python3', either way)
So, that's a pretty awful user interface. (The file is named ‘fooprog’ because it's an executable, intended to be run directly at the command line.) That solution would be rather inferior to the program being able to import modules when invoked as the top-level program. Can you suggest solutions that allow invoking the program as ‘./fooprog’ to work? -- \ “In economics, hope and faith coexist with great scientific | `\ pretension and also a deep desire for respectability.” —John | _o__) Kenneth Galbraith, 1970-06-07 | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
