On 2015-03-11 19:31, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 03/11/2015 01:29 PM, Chris Warrick wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote:
My biggest complaint with PySide is that for historical reasons (looking
at you, PyQt), it does not use pep8 naming conventions, which makes for
some really ugly function and method names.
This isn’t PyQt’s fault. Both are more-or-less straight bindings to
the underlying C++ Qt library, which does not follow Python’s naming
conventions.
Yes, but they could have simply converted the native Qt names to pep8.
Particularly when the bindings are automatically generated.
It is *extremely* helpful to have the names be the same in both C++ and PySide
as the documentation uses the C++ names, as well as every Googleable
conversation about Qt on the internet. It would be unnecessarily crippling to
change the names to satisfy a purely optional style guide.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
