On 07/19/2015 02:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Gregory Ewing > <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>> Personally I'd be fine with your initial syntax, but >> something else might be needed to get it past Guido. >> He didn't like my 'cocall f()' construct in PEP 3152, >> which is syntactically isomorphic to 'transfer f()'. > > Maybe it should get written up and rejected, then, to be something to > point to any time anyone advocates TCO. Those who remember the history of pep 308 will not find that a strong deterrent. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
