Paul Rubin schrieb: > Having a good FFI is certainly an important feature but Python > programs should first and foremost be Python programs.
Python was originally created as an extension language for C. In some sense it is an abstraction layer for C libs. > Compare the > situation with Java or Common Lisp for example. Both of those > languages have better FFI's than Python in every serious > implementation (consider why SWIG is popular--because Python's C API > is so clumsy), and yet the specs for those languages are far more > thorough than the Python docs. Did you ever check out ctypes? I appreciate it very much. http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/ctypes/ Kay -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
