On 03/17/2016 10:35 AM, Charles T. Smith wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:26:12 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 03/17/2016 09:36 AM, Charles T. Smith wrote:
Yes, your point was to forgo REs despite that they are useful.
I could have thought the search would have been better as:
'release[-.:][Rr]eq'
or something else ... you're in a "defend python at all costs!" mode.
No, I'm in the "don't try to write <language X> in Python" mode, and
"don't use 10lb sledge when 6oz hammer will do" mode:
Yes, fine.
I'd only like to add that the perl numbers might also improve
if the print in the loop were postponed.
Yup, might! Try it and see.
--
~Ethan~
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
