On 23/03/2016 16:24, Random832 wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016, at 12:08, Mark Lawrence wrote:
And doing it 'Pythonically' can lead to suggestions such as the
following the other day:
c, psource = psource[0], psource[1:]
(where psource is a very long string), which even I could tell, from
knowing what goes on behind the scenes, wasn't going to work well
(duplicating the rest of the string roughly every other character).
It would work perfectly. How would it duplicate the rest of the string
roughly every other character?
Er, I think he's suggesting that this would be in an inner loop
(something like while psource: c, psource = psource[0], psource[1:]).
What I'm not sure of is why he thinks this is pythonic.
It was in response to Dennis Lee Bieber
http://code.activestate.com/lists/python-list/700242/. Quite why he
thinks it won't work well I've no idea. I'd have said it was Pythonic,
as slicing is a standard idiom.
As for every other character, it again shows his complete ignorance of
Python. Although thinking about it, it you were to skip every character
that needed processing, surely that would be really fast?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
