Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrenced...@gmail.com> writes:
> I wonder about the point of that, though; I have heard of cases where > the judge ruled that the contract had been breached, and awarded > damages of one pound/dollar/euro. So other than winning a symbolic > victory, what was the point? Damages for breach of contract are supposed to reflect the loss you suffered as a result. A nominal award is basically saying, yes - the other guy has failed to fulfil his contractual promise, but you haven't actually suffered any real loss as a result. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
