Op 12-06-16 om 23:10 schreef BartC:
> On 12/06/2016 20:25, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>>   Just as here there is no link between x
>> and y:
>>
>>     x = 12
>>     y = x
> 
> (And that's a good illustration of why 'y' isn't a name reference to 'x', 
> referring to the "...ducks limp" thread. But best not to rake it up again...)
> 
I find this rather inaccurate reference to what your opposition is
supposed to have states together with the remark best not to rake
this up again, rather disingenuous
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to