Chris Angelico wrote: > […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >> If I knew that it is always going to be a list or a tuple, I would check >> its length instead: >> >> if len(errors) == 0: > > I wouldn't. I'd use boolification here too. Only if I had to > distinguish between None, [], and [1,2,3], would I use a more explicit > check (and it wouldn't be "== []", it would be probing for None).
Why (not)? -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
