On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <pointede...@web.de> wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: > >> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >>> If I knew that it is always going to be a list or a tuple, I would check >>> its length instead: >>> >>> if len(errors) == 0: >> >> I wouldn't. I'd use boolification here too. Only if I had to >> distinguish between None, [], and [1,2,3], would I use a more explicit >> check (and it wouldn't be "== []", it would be probing for None). > > Why (not)?
It's more Pythonic and faster. And shorter. What's not to love? ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list