On Sunday, 9 October 2016 13:18:32 UTC+5:30, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Here's the first part of the essay I said I'd write about > monads: > > http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/essays/monads/DemystifyingMonads.html > > Hope it's useful, > Greg
Thanks, that made a very interesting read. In Haskell, the type M a -> M b-> M b tells a good deal of the story of seq In a Pythonic context, continuations seem to be an effective way to carry that story. Small minor haskell suggestions from a pedagodic pov [related to Ben Finney's suggestion?] seq f g h = f (\s1 -> g h s1) better be written as seq f g x = f (\s1 -> g x s1) because naming conventions imply that h is function. - Anuradha -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
