Paul Rubin wrote:
Also if this operation is what it looks like, it's usually called "bind". seq is something else entirely.
Ah, I hadn't realised there was already a function in Haskell called seq -- sorry about that! I don't really want to call the Python version 'bind', because it seems a bit obscure. Also, the way I'm using it there, it's not actually binding anything (it corresponds to >> rather than >>=), so calling it 'bind' would just confuse matters. I'll see if I can come up with a better name for it that doesn't clash with anything. -- Greg -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
