On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Marko Rauhamaa <ma...@pacujo.net> wrote: > Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>: >> But as others have said, upgrading to 3.4+ is not as hard as many >> people fear, and your code generally improves as a result > > That's somewhat irrelevant. Point is, Python 2 will quickly become a > pariah in many corporations during or after 2018, and we are going to > see emergency measures similar to the Y2K craze twenty years ago. > > The risk to Python will be whether the occasion is exploited by fanboys > of competing programming languages. The migration from Python 2 might be > to something else than Python 3 in some circles.
And the sky is going to fall on Chicken Little's head, any day now. Let's see. You can port your code from Python 2.7 to Python 3.6 by running a script and then checking the results for bytes/text problems. You can port your code from Python 2.7 to Ruby by paying developers big bucks for a good while. Advantage: Ruby, obviously, because it's easier to change languages than to audit your code for places where you had lurking bugs that you didn't know about. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
