On 10/28/17 4:26 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
Ned Batchelder <n...@nedbatchelder.com> writes:
On 10/28/17 3:00 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?zqPPhM6tz4bOsc69zr/PgiDOo8+Jz4bPgc6/zr3Or86/z4U=?=
<stefanossofroniou...@gmail.com> writes:
What I wanted to ask is, is there a particular reason for not choosing
definition of »NULL«. »NULL« is not part of the C language proper.
Especially if NULL is not part of the standard,
»NULL« is defined in the standard, but it is an identifier
from the library and, therefore, needs an »#include«.
The language proper is the language core without any
library added.
The expression »NULL« AFAIK has only the meaning that
usually is intended if one of the headers needed for
it has been »#include«d.
The operator »!« and the if-statement do not require
any »#include«.
I certainly wouldn't adjust my coding style to avoid #include'ing the
definition of NULL.
--Ned.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
