On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Jon Ribbens <jon+use...@unequivocal.eu> wrote: > On 2017-11-06, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If you start with the assumption that "intuitively obvious" doesn't >> actually mean "intuitively obvious" but actually means something >> completely different, then your statement definitely means something >> non-contradictory. But if you start with the assumption that >> "intuitively obvious" really does mean that the purpose and meaning of >> for-else can be understood easily without external information, then >> your statement contradicts itself. > > I didn't say that 'for...else' was inherently "intutively obvious". > In fact I said the opposite of that. I said that *if* you start from > the right premise then it *becomes* intuitively obvious.
If you have to start by explaining a premise, it's not intuitive. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
