On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: > Yeah, I get it, you like your language to have lots and lots and lots of > syntax to do *slightly* different things. But it doesn't seem to be so > good at doing application level functionality. Its basically just a less > efficient, slightly prettier C.
With the word "dynamic" in its description, of course. That's VERY important. C is not a dynamic language. Bart's language is dynamic. That makes it unimaginably better. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
