On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 19:00:27 +0100, Paul Moore wrote: [...] > My point was that it's a *warning*, and as such it's perfectly possible > for a warning to *not* need addressing (other than to suppress or ignore > it once you're happy that doing so is the right approach).
And my point was that ignoring warnings is not the right approach. Suppressing them on a case-by-case basis (if possible) is one thing, but a blanket suppression goes to far, for the reasons I gave earlier. -- Steven D'Aprano "Ever since I learned about confirmation bias, I've been seeing it everywhere." -- Jon Ronson -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
