On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:38:25AM -0500, Dave wrote: > * GUI relatively easy to understand and implement. easyGUI is truly easy in > all areas, but fails some of my other requirements. The QT/PyQT/PySide2 > situation is a mess - which one to use, why, any implementation differences, > etc.
Python has been made a first-tier supported language in Qt just recently if I understood the news correctly. So, PySide2. > * Performance is very good. Users hate to wait - for anything! That's rarely a concern in chosing a GUI toolkit. > * Lots of widgets! I'll need a spreadsheet-like widget, a form widget to > enter information on parts, activities, etc., splash screen that the code > can talk to while the app is loading, and the big one - a cross-platform > printer widget that works with Windows and Mac/Unix/CUPS. A network widget > may also be good. Usable built-in printer support (and "network widget would be good") takes wxPython out of the equation. Karsten PS: Myself using wxPython, so no bashing there. -- GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list