On 20/11/19 9:20 AM, Luciano Ramalho wrote:
I apologize to all but the intended recipient for this. I’d have given him
feedback in private if I knew his email.
I will take leave from the list now. Keep up the good work, friendly
responders.
Please reconsider. Should your relationship with the 'good folks' be
governed by someone/anyone else?
There is no need to tell you that are many innocent reasons why we
misunderstand each other's motives or intent, particularly in a
multi-cultural context; just as there are folk who attempt to 'take
advantage'. Grossly generalised examples
- each academic year a new crop of PyStudents seems to crop-up, thinking
we'll *do* their 'homework' for them...
- some parts of British humor is impenetrable to those born south of Dover
- Dutch/German positivity can be interpreted as brusque or even
arrogant, in some parts of the world
- Kiwi/Aussie humor as often involves insult (which is not meant to be
taken seriously) as it does self-deprecation
- Self-deprecation is not 'the American way'...
- Monty Python humor is its own (lack of) explanation!
That said, I am asking (elsewhere, but please feel free...'here') if the
standards and conventions of the Python Foundation apply to this/these
list(s)? Such requires a balance between an individual's right to
privacy, and the open-ness with which we conduct Python-business, ie
without insult, derision, victimisation, etc, etc...
--
Regards =dn
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
