On 11/02/2021 12:30, Mr Flibble wrote: > I am starting work on creating a new Python implementation > from scratch using "neos" my universal compiler that can > compile any programming language.
Can i clarify that? Are you saying that you are going to recompile the existing C code for pyhton using yoour universal compiler and the resulting binary file will be a new implementation of the interpreter that you expect to be faster? That's what it sounds like to me. In which case the question is not whether you can write a better interpreter than CPython but whether you can write a better compiler than GNU/MING/VC etc While a universal compiler is certainly an interesting and challenging project I'm not sure how much it tells us about existing Python implementations. On the other hand, if you are planning on rewriting the existing interpreter in something other than C, what is that something? > Sample neos session (parsing a fibonacci program, > neoscript rather than Python in this case): I'm not sure what relevance this has unless you want to rewrite Python in neoscript? Or are you translating the C into neoscript and then compiling it? But in a later response you seem to say neoscript was not involved? Slightly confused... -- Alan G Author of the Learn to Program web site http://www.alan-g.me.uk/ http://www.amazon.com/author/alan_gauld Follow my photo-blog on Flickr at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/alangauldphotos -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
