On Saturday, February 13, 2021 at 7:19:58 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 11:14 AM Mr Flibble > <fli...@i42.removethisbit.co.uk> wrote: > > > > On 13/02/2021 23:30, Igor Korot wrote: > > > Hi, > > > But most importantly - what is the reason for this ? > > > I mean - what problems the actual python compiler produce? > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > I am creating neos as I need a performant scripting engine for my other > > major project "neoGFX" and I want to be able to support multiple popular > > scripting languages including Python. > > > Until you have actually produced a (mostly) compatible Python > implementation, can you please stop making these repeated and baseless > jabs at CPython's performance? You keep stating or hinting that > CPython is somehow unnecessarily slow, but unless you have some code > to back your claims, this is nothing but mudslinging. > > CPython is not as slow as you might think. And PyPy is highly > efficient at what it does well. Show us that you can do better than > these before you call them slow. > > At the absolute least, show that you have something that can run Python code. > > ChrisA
The OP has been making these claims on IRC for a while (at least two years). He has never cared to substantiate them, or even participate in a civil and detailed discussion. He is either 1) smarter than all of us, or 2) woefully under-informed, or 3) trolling. Our best course is to ignore him until he has code we can try. --Ned. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
