On 02/09/2021 19:30, Chris Angelico wrote: >> Without DST the schools opened in the dark so all the kids >> had to travel to school in the dark and the number of >> traffic accidents while crossing roads jumped. > > How do they manage in winter?
That was the winter. Sunrise wasn't till 10:00 or so and the schools open at 9. With DST sunrise became 9:00 and with pre-dawn light it is enough to see by. Its a recurring theme. Every now and then some smart young politician from the south of the UK suggests doing away with DST and a large crowd of northerners jump up and say no way! > Can that be solved with better street> lighting? They had street lighting but it casts dark shadows etc. In fact modern LED based street lighting is worse in that respect that the old yellow sodium lights were. But where it doesn't exist the cost of installing street lighting in small villages is too high compared to just changing the clocks. And of course street lighting has a real running cost that would be reflected in the local council taxes, and nobody wants to pay more of them! After all street lighting has been available for over 150 years, if they haven't installed it by now.... (I mean, nearly everywhere has some lighting, at least on the main roads, it's just the smaller back streets that tend to be dark.) > That was fifty years ago now, and the negative consequences > of DST are far stronger now. But not apparent to most people. Most still see it as a benefit because they get longer working daylight. -- Alan G Author of the Learn to Program web site http://www.alan-g.me.uk/ http://www.amazon.com/author/alan_gauld Follow my photo-blog on Flickr at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/alangauldphotos -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list