On 2023-03-01, Simon Ward <simon+pyt...@bleah.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 04:05:19PM -0500, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote: >>Is it rude to name something "black" to make it hard for some of us to >>remind them of the rules or claim that our personal style is so often >>the opposite that it should be called "white" or at least shade of >>gray? >> >>The usual kidding aside, I have no idea what it was called black but in >>all seriousness this is not a black and white issue. Opinions may >>differ when a language provides many valid options on how to write >>code. If someone wants to standardize and impose some decisions, fine. >>But other may choose their own variant and take their chances. > > https://pypi.org/project/grey/ > https://pypi.org/project/white/ > https://pypi.org/project/blue/ > https://pypi.org/project/oitnb/ > >:o > > It amuses me that opinionated formatter, with very little > configurability by design, in the face of differing opinions just > results in forks or wrappers that modify the behaviours that might > otherwise have been configuration options.
The mysterious bit is that two of the above projects do nothing except change the default of the one configuration option that *does* exist (line length). I mean, "black"'s line-length choice of 88 is insane, but I don't see the point of creating new pypi projects that do nothing except run another project with a single option set! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list