On 15/06/24 10:00, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
I notice that in some recent discussions, we have users who cannot be
replied to directly as their email addresses are not valid ones, and I
believe on purpose. Examples in the thread I was going to reply to are:
...
It's an interesting conundrum. There are good reasons and nefarious, for
such behavior.
Some have questioned my behavior in similar regard - asking why I use
initials (also used IRL). It is because my first name "David" is/was
very popular. At a meeting this week there were three of us. Thus,
"David", "Dave", and "dn" was necessary to distinguish between us.
These mailing-lists all run under the Python Code of Conduct.
This also effects a conundrum. Firstly, that someone abusing others (for
example) shall be held responsible. Secondly, that in order to hold
someone responsible, he/she/... must be identifiable.
Personal opinion: if someone is asked a
question/clarification/sample-code, particularly as a response to their
own OP, and does not answer; this is at the least rude, and thus
disrespectful, or at worst grounds for not bothering with them again -
hardly a 'community' attitude!
--
Regards,
=dn
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
