Terry Hancock wrote: > By the way, dict.org doesn't think "execresence" is a word, > although I interpret the neologism as meaning something like > "execrable utterance": > > dict.org said: > > No definitions found for 'execresence'!
however, 'excrescence' appears to be a perfectly cromulent word: http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2004/08/22.html http://www.wordsmith.org/words/excrescence.html maybe dict.org just needs to work on their "did you mean" algorithm? </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
