"Martin P. Hellwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Bokma wrote: > <cut> >> You mean like the lamp that keeps burning forever, like Philips has? > > No more like all the hydrogen technologies that shell has in their > possession for the last decades and only recently has begun to restart > those projects. > >>> Although Commodore where never serious competitors, >> >> Because there programming skills were as worse as MS? I mean, their >> BASIC had only 2 instuctions: PEEK and POKE? > > eehm Amiga?
Eehm: Acorn Archimedes? > <cut> >> >> Yet you call NT slightly better compared to Windows 95. So you have >> no clue what you're talking about. > > So I see you never worked serious with 3.5 . Yeah, that's it, I am sure. >>> then where we are now. Perhaps we even had a other mainstream >>> architecture like sparcs and powerpc's. >> >> But "crippled" like Intel. > > Yeah right sparc is crippled... Yeah, right: Sparc is the ultimate goal in processor design, the best of the best. You think it would have been that good if it was a mainstream processor? -- John Small Perl scripts: http://johnbokma.com/perl/ Perl programmer available: http://castleamber.com/ I ploink googlegroups.com :-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
