Roedy Green wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:06:16 -0700, "David Schwartz" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who > said : > > >> Right I understand that. You could have complied simply by only selling >>computers with Windows preinstalled. In other words, you could have treated >>this the same as a demand for franchise or exclusivity if you had wanted to. > > > It is obvious to everyone WHY MS did this, to maintain monopoly. But > ignore motive for a while and see what they actually did and exactly > how they intended to carry out he threat of destroying my business. > What they did is clearly criminal. The hard part is proving it. Like > any smart criminal who makes a threat, MS left no paper trail.. <snip> > 2. it was a threat to force me to commit a criminal act -- namely > extract money from people and hand it to Microsoft and give those
What, specifically, is the criminal act of which you speak? -- Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen http://usinglvkblog.blogspot.com/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP KeyID: 0x2A42A1C2 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list