Magnus Lycka wrote:
> The static typing means that you either have to make several
> implementations of many algorithms, or you need to work with
> those convoluted templates that were added to the language as
> an afterthought.
I don't see this in Haskell.

> While feature-by-feature comparisions of different
> programming languages might have some merit, the only
> thing that counts in the end is how the total package
> works... I think you'll find that Python is a useful
> package, and a good tool in a bigger tool chest.
That is very true.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to