-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "Kent" == Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kent> [Karrigell is GPL'ed] Unfortunately this makes it impossible for Kent> me to consider using Karrigell in my work. I recently needed a Kent> stand-alone web server for a small in-house project that might Kent> possibly be distributed to business partners or become a product Kent> some day. I chose CherryPy in part because its license allows Kent> this. I would have considered Karrigell if it had a different Kent> license.
None of this really matters, you know. The GPL only requires that you share your source code if you _distribute_ your modifications. Since you make your modifications exclusively for your own (your company's) use, you are not required to share anything. Thus the whole debate is pretty much moot if I am not much mistaken. Martin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using Mailcrypt+GnuPG <http://www.gnupg.org> iEYEARECAAYFAkOpbaUACgkQYu1fMmOQldUR/QCffOi9bYnmUeEcT8zdvF60voah cy4AoIb69dAv6dr6WmpaIZPipq1xZbF0 =/eTj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
