Fuzzyman wrote: > > (hmm. maybe "web.py" fits the spec? but that's more a library than a > > frame- > > work, of course...) > > web.py has the great advantage that (allegedly) you can migrate apps > from CGI to FastCGI, mod_python, WSGI. > > It hardly counts as stable of course - having just been released.
given the amount of "I just updated and nothing works" messages I see in certain framework foras, web.py is probably about as stable as anything else... </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
