[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Even your technique narrows the list of candidates down to one, that > doesn't solve the problem. There is a certain "stamp of approval" > implicit with inclusion in the standard library. It's thus a fairly > important decision to get at least approximately right.
Yes, but something completely unsuitable shouldn't be on the list in the first place. The main point is there aren't a million packages to worry about, there are a handful, and that can probably be quickly narrowed down to even fewer. Once that's done, the remaining candidates can be considered in more depth. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
