[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Fuzzyman wrote: > > > The code is relatively simple - so it would be easy to maintain the > > parts you use if that was necessary. Certainly easier than duplicating > > it yourself from scratch. :-) > > Sounds convincing, I'll give it a shot after all.
Ok, after brief eyeballing & experimenting, it appears that Wax is just what I was looking for. The code is simple, concise and trivially understandable, the level of wrapping seems about right, and examples are helpful. I'm glad I came whining about this in c.l.py instead of sucking it up or switching toolkits altogether. :-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
