Petr Prikryl wrote: > My question: Could the old classes be treated in > a new Python treated as new classes with "implicit" > base object? (I know the Zen... ;-) > > Example: I use usually a very simple classes. When I add > "(object)" to my class definitions, the code continues to > works fine -- plus I have new features to use. > Why this cannot be done automatically? What could > be broken in the old code if it was threated so? > > Thanks for explanation, > pepr Well, apparently this is exactly whats going to happen in the future, but not until Python 3.0. Simple as that.
But I guess I'll just keep adding the (object) appendix even after that, so all my class definitions get syntax highlighting. Also it clarifies "what the score is" (to paraphrase Bender). wildemar -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
