Emacs must be dying if this thread could get all the way to 20 with nobody arguing with the vi folks. Will the Windows vim and gvim users vouch for its stability on Windows?
rd -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Re: a good programming text editor (not... Larry Bates
- Re: a good programming text editor... John Salerno
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) olsongt
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE... Roel Schroeven
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) bruno at modulix
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) James Stroud
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Paddy
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) RunLevelZero
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) BartlebyScrivener
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Benji York
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Jarek Zgoda
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Fredrik Lundh
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Jarek Zgoda
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Fredrik Lundh
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Jarek Zgoda
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Grant Edwards
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) John Salerno
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Slawomir Nowaczyk
- Re: a good programming text editor (not IDE) Michele Simionato
