I seem to recall a debate about this a little while ago. I'm in favour of dropping the munging. Obligatory link to http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 2:17:22 PM Andy Robinson <a...@reportlab.com> wrote: > I'm one of the list admins. There are a couple of others. Happy to > make a change if a significant majority feel that way. > > However, sometimes accidental replies are the only thing keeping the > list alive ;-) > > On 4 February 2015 at 14:12, Sven Marnach <smarn...@google.com> wrote: > > Maybe we could just get rid of the pointless "Reply-To" header? It can > be > > disabled by a list admin on the Mailman admin page. > > > > I get the impression that at least one person per month falls victim to > it. > > The reverse, people accidentally answering just to the sender instead of > the > > whole list, seems better than people accidentally sending private emails > to > > everyone. > > > > Cheers, > > Sven > > > > _______________________________________________ > > python-uk mailing list > > python-uk@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk > > > > > > -- > Andy Robinson > Managing Director > ReportLab Europe Ltd. > Thornton House, Thornton Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 4NG, UK > Tel +44-20-8405-6420 > _______________________________________________ > python-uk mailing list > python-uk@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk >
_______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk