I'm generally persuaded by the arguments against reply-to. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:30 PM, xtian <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm pro dropping the reply-to header, it's always awkward when someone > gets bitten by it. People are much more familiar with the difference > between reply and reply all now than they were when the reply-to header > solution was devised. > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:22 Richard Barran <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> More sensible, but a lot less fun for us in the popcorn gallery! >> >> > The reverse, people accidentally answering just to the sender instead >> of the whole list, seems better than people accidentally sending private >> emails to everyone. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> python-uk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk >> > > _______________________________________________ > python-uk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk > > -- Marcin Tustin Tel: +44 (0) 7773 787 105 (UK) +1 917 553 3974 (US)
_______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
