On 08/12/2016 14:00, Andy Robinson wrote:
On 8 December 2016 at 09:29, James Broadhead <jamesbroadh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Personally, I'd be in favour of #2 - it allows the community to promote
positions internally, but avoids recruiter-mails which seem to trigger so
much ire.
It seems to me that the real issue was a tiny number of list members
being rude to or about Sophie Hendley.
But if we are to consider changing our policy on this, then we need to
find out what the 720 subscribers think. I would not want to cut
that many people off from a relevant and interesting future job offer
if less than 1% of them are grumbling about recruiters. How many
people would need to express an opinion to warrant changing things?
- Andy
Please leave things alone. I regard this entire thread as a storm in a
thimble.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
_______________________________________________
python-uk mailing list
python-uk@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
