On 7-jan-05, at 22:55, Brendan Simons wrote:

This is an old thread, (and an old topic) but my
question is about the state of the "new tools"
described in Bob's presentation at last year's pyCon.

Scanning the archives, I see Jack and Just have talked
about a PyObjC-based python ide since 2002.  I've
really anxious to see how they are coming along.

Aren't we all:-(

The problem is one of time: I've spent all of my working hours the last year on a completely un-pythonic project (www.ambulantplayer.org, but I do plan to do Python bindings some time this year), and now that I finally have some time to do Python work I'm concentrating on the important infrastructural problems (mainly the "multiple-python-problem" and getting Package Manager to be more maintainable). I assume Just is similarly occupied by other priorities (hmm, that doesn't look like english:-).

I haven't even had the time to seriously look at PyOXIDE, let alone the other contenders. But I'm still very interested in getting a good replacement for the IDE, it's just that I don't have the time to invest in it.

Is there some way we could turn this "next generation IDE" thing into a group effort?
--
Jack Jansen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman


_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

Reply via email to