On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:53:38AM -0600, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> Here's the rub.  Apple seems to rather quickly drop support for what appear
> (numerically) to be minor releases.  10.1 is long gone.  I have 10.3 on my
> G5 and 10.2 on my laptop.  I'm loathe to buy 10.3 at this point for my
> laptop because 10.4 is in beta (right?  Apple offered a preview version of
> 10.4 to me for $500 recently).  I figure as soon as I buy 10.3, 10.4 final
> will be released.  10.3 will start to corrode and I'll be stuck again with
> "old" software once again.

10.3's popularity was a lot greater than 10.2's; also, the time
between 10.3 and 10.4 was considerably greater.  I imagine it'll last
you longer than 10.2 did, but you may find yourself wishing for 10.4
in a few months.

> Only now I have two Macs, so the costs are double.

Not quite; you can get a "family pack" good for up to 5 machines owned
by an individual or family for less than twice the price.

<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000E6NKA/104-1061095-1859926>

> It seems that Apple's upgrade policy almost forces me to buy new versions as
> soon as they are released.  If I snooze when new releases come out I quickly
> get left in the dust and wind up either skipping a version or upgrading
> right before the next release.  (This has happened to me in the past.)  I
> really hate to say this, but in this respect backward compatibility in
> Windows seems to be much better.  Am I missing something?

Only that Mac OS X started out a lot less mature than recent versions
of Windows, and is evolving a lot faster than Windows, so often the
reason why a new Mac OS X version is required is that the
functionality simply didn't exist in the prior version.

Yes, backwards compatibility in Windows is better than Mac OS X, with
most products I see still supporting back to Windows 98, and some
requiring Windows 2000 (released December 1999, to use one
definition).

Mac OS X 10.0 wasn't even released until March 2001.  I used 10.0, but
had to reboot into Mac OS 9 a lot.  10.1 (September 2001) was a
marginal improvement, but not a paid upgrade; still I couldn't use OS
X full-time.  10.2 (August 2002) was the first version I voluntarily
gave other people to use, and 10.3 (October 2003) the version I gave
my mother.

10.4 is unlikely to be released before April 2005.  Note that the time
between releases continues to increase.  I doubt Mac OS X is ever
going to see Windows' multi-year release cycles, but you can expect
better backwards compatibility in future.

-- 
Nicholas Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley>
_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

Reply via email to