Bob Ippolito wrote:
> Caveat emptor. You can not build extensions on 10.3.9 when using a
> universal build.
Fair enough. No is going to be running 10.3 on an Intel Mac. If you want
to develop for Intel users, you need 10.4. Period.
However, given that, I think we should perhaps just suggest that 10.3.*
users stick with a PPC only build. That would give us two builds to
support with pre-built binaries, but a bunch are already done. I'm sorry
to say that I just switched to 10.4, so I wont' be building an packages
for 10.3.
> That said, you'd be able to use it, and install all the eggs/mpkgs you
> want, but you would not be able to use it with a compiler.
The other option is to say: "If you don't intend to build your own
packages, use the universal build", but I think that's risky, and a
newbie might not think s/he is going to build anything, but will
discover later that they need to.
> That goes both ways, users of the universal build can't use "legacy"
> eggs (marked with ppc or i386 architecture) from the current builds.
That's OK. I think we can rally the community to build a good collection
of stuff one the universal build comes out. Maybe none of them will be
tested on Intel, but so be it!
Bob, what do you think the timescale is for a universal build? If it's
soon, then we should work on re-0writing the web site as though it's
ready to go.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
